‹ Previous · Contents · Next ›

الْمَفْهُومُ وَأَقْسَامُهُ · al-Mafhum wa Aqsamuhu (Implication, and Its Kinds)

• تَنْبِيهٌ · Editorial Note
• الْمَنْطُوقُ وَالْمَفْهُومُ · Manṭuq vs Mafhum
• مَفْهُومُ الْمُوَافَقَةِ · Mafhum al-Muwafaqah (Concordant Implication)
• مَفْهُومُ الْمُخَالَفَةِ · Mafhum al-Mukhalafah (Divergent Implication / Counter-Implication)
• الْمَفْهُومُ الْمُخَالِفُ فِي عِبَارَاتِ الْفُقَهَاءِ · The Counter-Implication of the Fuqahā's Words (Taqī ʿUthmānī)

تَنْبِيهٌ · Editorial Note

[مُلْحَقٌ] هَذَا الْفَصْلُ مِنْ شَرْحِ ابْنِ عَابِدِينَ نَفْسِهِ (الْبَيْتُ ٦٨)، وَهُوَ أَصْلٌ أُصُولِيٌّ كِلَاسِيكِيٌّ يُؤَسِّسُ لِمَا يَأْتِي بَعْدَهُ مِنْ كَلَامِ التَّقِيِّ الْعُثْمَانِيِّ فِي الْمَفْهُومِ الْمُخَالِفِ

• This section is Ibn ʿAbidin's own commentary (verse 68); it is the classical usul foundation for what follows from Taqi ʿUthmani on counter-implication

↑ Top of page

الْمَنْطُوقُ وَالْمَفْهُومُ · Manṭuq vs Mafhum

[النَّصُّ] وَاعْمَلْ بِمَفْهُومِ رِوَايَاتٍ أَتَى، مَا لَمْ يُخَالِفْ لِصَرِيحٍ ثَبَتَا

• Act upon the mafhum (implication) of narrations that have come, so long as it does not contradict something explicitly established

[التَّعْرِيفُ] الْمَنْطُوقُ: مَا دَلَّ عَلَيْهِ اللَّفْظُ فِي مَحَلِّ النُّطْقِ، أَيْ دَلَالَةُ اللَّفْظِ عَلَى حُكْمٍ مَذْكُورٍ فِي الْكَلَامِ. وَالْمَفْهُومُ: مَا دَلَّ عَلَيْهِ اللَّفْظُ لَا فِي مَحَلِّ النُّطْقِ، أَيْ دَلَالَةُ اللَّفْظِ عَلَى حُكْمٍ لِغَيْرِ الْمَذْكُورِ

• Manṭuq is what the wording directly states, its indication of a ruling actually mentioned in the speech. Mafhum is what the wording does NOT directly state, its indication of a ruling for something not mentioned at all

📖 مَوْضِعٌ (طَبَعَةُ الرَّشِيدِ، كَرَاتْشِي، بِحَاشِيَةِ أَبِي لُبَابَةَ)، ص ١٥٩-١٦٠ — al-Rashid Trust print, Karachi, Abu Lubaba hashiya ed., pp. 159-160

↑ Top of page

مَفْهُومُ الْمُوَافَقَةِ · Mafhum al-Muwafaqah (Concordant Implication)

[التَّعْرِيفُ] مَا يَكُونُ الْمَسْكُوتُ عَنْهُ مُوَافِقًا لِلْمَنْطُوقِ فِي الْحُكْمِ. فَإِنْ كَانَ الْمَسْكُوتُ أَوْلَى بِالْحُكْمِ مِنَ الْمَنْطُوقِ بِهِ سُمِّيَ "فَحْوَى الْخِطَابِ"، وَإِنْ كَانَ مُسَاوِيًا لَهُ سُمِّيَ "لَحْنَ الْخِطَابِ"

• When the unspoken case agrees with the explicit one in ruling. If the unspoken case has an even stronger claim to the ruling than the explicit one, it is called fahwa al-khitab (the a fortiori sense); if it is merely equal, it is called lahn al-khitab

[مِثَالٌ] ﴿لَا تَقُلْ لَهُمَا أُفٍّ﴾ — فَإِذَا حَرُمَ مُجَرَّدُ التَّأْفِيفِ لِلْوَالِدَيْنِ، فَضَرْبُهُمَا أَوْ شَتْمُهُمَا أَوْلَى بِالتَّحْرِيمِ، بِفَحْوَى الْخِطَابِ

• Example: "Do not say 'uff' to them [your parents]" — if the mere utterance of disrespect is forbidden, then striking or cursing them is forbidden with even greater force, by fahwa al-khitab

📖 مَوْضِعٌ (طَبَعَةُ الرَّشِيدِ، كَرَاتْشِي، بِحَاشِيَةِ أَبِي لُبَابَةَ)، ص ١٦٠ — al-Rashid Trust print, Karachi, Abu Lubaba hashiya ed., p. 160

↑ Top of page

مَفْهُومُ الْمُخَالَفَةِ · Mafhum al-Mukhalafah (Divergent Implication / Counter-Implication)

[التَّعْرِيفُ] دَلَالَةُ اللَّفْظِ عَلَى ثُبُوتِ نَقِيضِ حُكْمِ الْمَنْطُوقِ لِلْمَسْكُوتِ عَنْهُ

• The wording's indication that the OPPOSITE of the explicit ruling holds for the unspoken case

[أَقْسَامُهُ] بَلَغَتْ أَنْوَاعُهُ عِنْدَ الْقَائِلِينَ بِهِ عَشَرَةَ أَصْنَافٍ مُتَفَاوِتَةً فِي الْقُوَّةِ، ذَكَرَ الشَّارِحُ مِنْهَا خَمْسَةً مَشْهُورَةً: مَفْهُومُ اللُّغَةِ، وَمَفْهُومُ الْحَصْرِ، وَمَفْهُومُ الْحَالِ، وَمَفْهُومُ الزَّمَانِ، وَمَفْهُومُ الْمَكَانِ. وَالثَّلَاثَةُ الْأَخِيرَةُ دَاخِلَةٌ فِي الْحَقِيقَةِ فِي مَفْهُومِ الصِّفَةِ عِنْدَ الْأُصُولِيِّينَ، وَإِنَّمَا أُفْرِدَتْ بِالذِّكْرِ تَتْمِيمًا لِلْفَائِدَةِ

• Those who accept mafhum mukhalafah count ten kinds of varying strength; Ibn ʿAbidin names five well-known ones: mafhum of a word's plain sense (lughah), of exclusivity (hasr), of state (hal), of time (zaman), and of place (makan). The last three are, in reality, just sub-cases of mafhum al-sifah (a qualifying attribute) to the usulis; they are only listed separately here to round out the benefit

[مِثَالٌ اللُّغَةِ] حُرِّمَتِ الْخَمْرُ لِإِسْكَارِهَا — وَمِثَالُ الْحَصْرِ: «إِنَّمَا الرِّبَا فِي النَّسِيئَةِ»، «إِنَّمَا الشُّفْعَةُ فِيمَا لَمْ يُقْسَمْ»

• Example of lughah: "khamr is forbidden because it intoxicates" (implying a non-intoxicating drink isn't ruled as khamr). Examples of hasr: "riba is only in deferred exchange," "pre-emption (shufʿah) is only in what hasn't been divided"

[مِثَالُ الصِّفَةِ] "فِي الْغَنَمِ السَّائِمَةِ زَكَاةٌ" — يُفْهَمُ مِنْهُ أَنَّ الْغَنَمَ الْمَعْلُوفَةَ (غَيْرَ السَّائِمَةِ) لَا زَكَاةَ فِيهَا؛ لِأَنَّ الْحُكْمَ عُلِّقَ بِوَصْفِ "السَّوْمِ"

• Example of an attribute (sifah): "there is zakat due on free-grazing sheep" implies that stall-fed sheep carry no zakat obligation, since the ruling was tied to the qualifying attribute of grazing

📖 مَوْضِعٌ (طَبَعَةُ الرَّشِيدِ، كَرَاتْشِي، بِحَاشِيَةِ أَبِي لُبَابَةَ)، ص ١٦١ — al-Rashid Trust print, Karachi, Abu Lubaba hashiya ed., p. 161

[أَمْثِلَةٌ إِضَافِيَّةٌ] مَفْهُومُ الشَّرْطِ: ﴿وَإِنْ كُنَّ أُولَاتِ حَمْلٍ فَأَنْفِقُوا عَلَيْهِنَّ﴾ — يُفْهَمُ عَدَمُ وُجُوبِ النَّفَقَةِ إِنْ لَمْ تَكُنْ حَامِلًا. مَفْهُومُ الْغَايَةِ: ﴿حَتَّى تَنْكِحَ زَوْجًا غَيْرَهُ﴾ وَ﴿كُلُوا وَاشْرَبُوا حَتَّى يَتَبَيَّنَ لَكُمُ الْخَيْطُ الْأَبْيَضُ﴾. مَفْهُومُ الْعَدَدِ: ﴿ثَمَانِينَ جَلْدَةً﴾ — لَا أَقَلَّ وَلَا أَكْثَرَ. مَفْهُومُ اللَّقَبِ: "فِي الْغَنَمِ زَكَاةٌ" (اسْمٌ جَامِدٌ، خِلَافِيٌّ حَتَّى عِنْدَ الْقَائِلِينَ بِالْمُخَالَفَةِ)

• Further named subtypes with real examples: mafhum al-shart (a ruling tied to a stated condition) — "if they are pregnant, spend on them" implies no such obligation if she isn't pregnant; mafhum al-ghaya (tied to an end-point, "until"/"hatta") — the iddah verse and the fasting verse; mafhum al-'adad (tied to a specific number) — "eighty lashes" implies exactly that, no more, no less; mafhum al-laqab (tied to a bare proper/common noun, the weakest and most disputed even among those who accept mafhum mukhalafah generally) — "on grazing sheep is zakat"

[الْخِلَافُ الْمَذْهَبِيُّ] الشَّافِعِيَّةُ وَجُمْهُورُ الْمُتَكَلِّمِينَ: مَفْهُومُ الْمُخَالَفَةِ حُجَّةٌ فِي كُلِّ أَقْسَامِهِ إِلَّا اللَّقَبَ. الْحَنَفِيَّةُ (كَالظَّاهِرِيَّةِ): غَيْرُ مُعْتَبَرٍ أَصْلًا فِي خِطَابِ الشَّارِعِ، لِأَنَّ مَقَاصِدَ الشَّرْعِ لَا تُحَاطُ بِخِلَافِ مَقَاصِدِ الْبَشَرِ؛ لَكِنَّهُ مُعْتَبَرٌ عِنْدَهُمْ بِأَقْسَامِهِ كُلِّهَا حَتَّى اللَّقَبِ فِي الرِّوَايَاتِ الْفِقْهِيَّةِ نَفْسِهَا (كَقَوْلِهِمْ: "صَلَاةُ الْجُمُعَةِ عَلَى الرِّجَالِ الْأَحْرَارِ")

• The real madhhab split: the Shafi'is and most theologians treat mafhum al-mukhalafah as binding in every subtype except laqab; the Hanafis reject it entirely in the Lawgiver's own speech, reasoning that a qualifier's purpose in revelation can never be fully known the way a human speaker's purpose can — yet they DO accept it, in every subtype including laqab, within the fuqaha's own technical statements (e.g. "Jumu'ah prayer is upon free men," implying it's not obligatory on women or slaves)

[دَلِيلٌ حَنَفِيٌّ] ﴿فَإِنَّ عِدَّةَ الشُّهُورِ عِنْدَ اللهِ اثْنَا عَشَرَ شَهْرًا مِنْهَا أَرْبَعَةٌ حُرُمٌ﴾ لَمْ يَدُلَّ تَخْصِيصُ الْأَرْبَعَةِ عَلَى إِبَاحَةِ الظُّلْمِ فِي غَيْرِهَا؛ وَلَوْ كَانَ مَفْهُومُ الْمُخَالَفَةِ مُعْتَبَرًا لَمَا احْتَاجَ الشَّارِعُ إِلَى التَّصْرِيحِ بِالْحُكْمِ الْمُخَالِفِ فِي آيَتَيِ الْحَيْضِ وَرَبِيبَةِ الزَّوْجَةِ

• A Hanafi proof: singling out the four sacred months by name does not imply oppression is permitted in the other eight — oppression is forbidden always; and if mafhum al-mukhalafah were reliably valid, Allah would not have needed to state the opposite ruling explicitly in both the menstruation verse and the step-daughter verse, yet He did

📖 مَوْضِعٌ ص ١٦٢-١٦٤ — pp. 162-164

↑ Top of page

الْمَفْهُومُ الْمُخَالِفُ فِي عِبَارَاتِ الْفُقَهَاءِ · The Counter-Implication of the Fuqahā's Words (Taqī ʿUthmānī)

[النَّصُّ] إِنَّ الْمَفْهُومَ الْمُخَالِفَ، وَإِنْ كَانَ غَيْرَ مُعْتَبَرٍ فِي النُّصُوصِ الشَّرْعِيَّةِ، وَلَكِنَّهُ مُعْتَبَرٌ فِي عِبَارَاتِ كُتُبِ الْفِقْهِ، فَيَصِحُّ الْعَمَلُ بِمَفْهُومِ عِبَارَاتِ الْكُتُبِ الْفِقْهِيَّةِ، بِشَرْطِ أَنْ لَا يَكُونَ ذَلِكَ الْمَفْهُومُ الْمُخَالِفُ مُعَارِضًا لِصَرِيحِ الْعِبَارَاتِ الْأُخْرَى

• Counter-implication (mafhūm mukhālaf, مفهوم مخالف), though not relied on in the texts of the Sharīʿa, is relied on in the wording of the fiqh books. So acting on the counter-implication of the fiqh books' wording is valid, on condition that it does not clash with the explicit sense of other wordings.

[مَعْنًى] Treat a qualifier in a fiqh text as intended, unless the context shows otherwise. Example: "zakat is due on grazing camels" (السائمة) points to no zakat on stall-fed camels (العلوفة) — the same sa'ima/'ulufa example the classical hashiya above uses, independently, for sheep

📘 التقي العثماني، أصول الإفتاء وآدابه، ص ٢٣٢

↑ Top of page

‹ Previous · Contents · Next ›